Still, as others have commented in SAAP group their is something wrong with the description. As I have written their also, at the very least they could have mentioned Peirce, James and Dewey (Mead is below James in the above picture. Or take it from the British perspective, what would the scholars on Russell and Moore say?
I posted further on the SAAP group also that:
"Over the past century,
many distinguished Cambridge philosophers have been pragmatists in one
sense or another." That's stretching it. Before this sentence they
could have added something like:" Peirce and his views on blah blah,
James and his views on blah blah and Dewey on his views on blah blah..."
Even then I wouldn't really know if that were enough.
With any luck, the conference will be productive and take seriously some of the issues raised by the classical pragmatists. After all, part of recognizing their contribution is appreciating their being able to anticipate some of the more recent discussions now in philosophy.
No comments:
Post a Comment