Comments and annotations on my academic stuff in square brackets.
Tolstoy
looks at the problem [of the meaning of life] as a question, “Why should I live?” And what was Tolstoy’s
answer? It should be noted that Tolstoy deeply thought about this and came up
to a limit to what he refers to as “rational knowledge.” In a more
straightforward fashion Tolstoy (2000, 16-7) explains his previous reflections
and makes a realization:
In
verifying the train of thoughts of my rational knowledge, I found that it was
quite correct. The deduction that life was nothing was inevitable; but I saw a
mistake. The mistake was that I had not reasoned in conformity with the
question put by me. The question was, “Why should I live?” that is, “What real,
indestructible essence will come from my phantasmal, destructible life? What
meaning has my finite existence in this infinite world?” And in order to answer
this question, I studied life.
“…I studied life”, Tolstoy reflected on his own
situation that some would find enviable. Yet, enviable as Tolstoy might have
been to others his plight can be seen as shared by people who reflect on the
significance and value of their lives. Such reflections are sometimes caused by
traumatic experiences [Can we say that this is now a stereotype?], but the case of Tolstoy is different, more akin to a
mystical experience combined with a philosophical searching of oneself. [What happened to the spacing?]
Here's my reference to Tolstoy:
The new (3rd) edition also looks good. I wonder how Klemke is.
No comments:
Post a Comment